It should be noted that not only is this NOT a political piece, but also an opinion and conspiracy piece, and should be viewed as such.

The Facts:

On September 10th, 2025, Political activist Charlie Kirk was assassinated by a rooftop shooter during a live debate at Utah Valley University. While it wasn’t immediately confirmed, it is widely believed Kirk died within seconds of being struck. Moments after people began to flee the active shooter scene, a 71-year-old man was arrested on the ground, claiming that he had shot Kirk. It was later revealed that this man, George Zinn, was NOT the shooter. The assassin would be revealed roughly 24 hours later as 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, who had turned himself in to his father, a former law enforcement officer, before being turned over to authorities. The investigation is currently ongoing as of 09/16/25.

The Background

For those unaware, Kirk, who founded Turning Point USA, made his living as a right-wing, Christian, political activist alongside his talk show, The Charlie Kirk Show, and his widely recognized open forum live debate platform that traveled across the country to college campuses, encouraging political discourse. Kirk was notoriously very heavily right-wing leaning; however, more and more conservatives had begun to question his unrelenting loyalty to the modern-day nation-state of Israel. Something that will come into the conversation as we discuss…

24 Hours Prior (Israel and ignored warnings)

Just 24 hours prior to the incident at Utah Valley University, Charlie Kirk invited fellow right-wing activist Ben Shapiro to join him on The Charlie Kirk Show. Much to the surprise of Kirk’s listeners, Charlie’s conversation for the show revolved around questioning the recent bombing of Qatar as orchestrated by Israel. Other topics of discussion involved Epstein’s potential involvement within the Israeli government and Israel’s political grip on the United States.

Israel

As previously stated, Kirk was known, almost to a comedic extent, online as an avid defender of all things Israel. With increasing questioning of Charlie’s support for the nation state growing among campus discussions, it might not be unrealistic to think some of the points did, in fact, begin to change his mind. The coincidence that Kirk’s last show featured heavy criticism of Israel, their intelligence agencies, and covert work with the US Government seems eerily ominous, knowing he would be assassinated just 24 hours later. Now, the man Kirk had invited on that last program has been understandably very vocal about the situation. Ben Shapiro was a colleague of Kirk, a fellow right-wing activist who made his career focusing on live debate, discussion, and political discourse. Shaperio not only spoke very vocally about how these actions should not silence political discourse, but recently also donated $1 million to Turning Point USA. What seems like a genuine act of kindness to promote the future of discourse has not been taken as such by everyone, however. Almost instantly, the online community jumped to the conclusion that Shapiro may also be using this tragedy to insert himself as the new frontrunner for right-wing political discourse across the nation. Internet theorists have begun speculating that Kirk could have potentially not only been offed by Israel for his recent shift in attitude, but also that the nation state may have inserted Shapiro to ensure they remain in a positive light within conservative media. This, of course, is all THEORY currently.

Twitter Warning

Prior to Kirk’s arrival at Utah Valley University, an X account under the name Omar Najra Galvz began tweeting some cryptic messages in relation to the event. Tweets from this account included “Charlie Kirk is coming to my college tomorrow and I really hope someone evaporates him completely.”, “Let’s just say something big will happen tomorrow.”. Curiously, to our knowlegde, these tweets were never investigated by authorities or Utah Valley University and seemingly went unseen by Kirk and his team. There has been no connection made between the assassin and this account.

A little TOO similar

July 13th, 2024

If we recall back to July 13th, 2024, President Donald Trump was giving a speech in Butler, PA, when a would-be assassin fired off numerous shots from a rooftop in an attempt to end the president’s life. The infamous shot grazed Trump’s ear before he was rushed out by the Secret Service, and the shooter was taken out. But let’s break down the order of events. If you recall, the shooter was not identified until later that evening in fact, multiple posts on social media and news networks began to name suspects who turned out to have no relation to the event at all. The official report claims the shooter made his way onto a slanted rooftop. Despite several attendees notifying local police, nothing was done to investigate the man toting a rifle to a rooftop.

September 10th, 2025

In the case of Charlie Kirk, as we’ve covered, miraculously, no local law enforcement or security noticed a man a mere 200 yards away from Charlie’s booth ascend to a rooftop with his rifle. After the shot rang out, police identified and arrested the wrong suspect. And the most unbelievable, the assassin was able to descend from the roof, leave an active crime scene, and exit the college campus, all with possession of his weapon. The official story reports the weapon being found in the woods nearby, wrapped in a towel. Further reports included the details that the shooter had engraved messages and memes in the casings of his bullets, as well as a manifesto that was shared online but could not be recovered. We’ll get back to that in a moment.

August 27th, 2025

On August 27th, 2025, just weeks before the assassination of Charlie Kirk, 23-year-old Robin Westman opened fire on a Minneapolis church, killing two children and wounding 14 others. The reason for this inclusion boils down to two key factors of this disgusting attack. One day prior to this attack, the killer had posted a detailed manifesto outlining their plan and posted it to YouTube for anyone to see. Nothing was reported. Following the attack, the police disclosed the shooter’s rifle had been covered and etched with messages ranging from “Blackrock” to Russian lettering.

Conclusions

In my opinion, this was NOT a random act of political violence like we’ve been told. The amount of copy and paste tactics, narratives, and plot hole-ridden stories is just too coincidental. The fact that so many similarities are shared between the Trump assassination attempt last year and Kirk’s murder this year, not the least of which being the narrative of a Transgender/Transgender activist, left-wing shooter to push further political divide. I am not denying these shooters have or have not fallen more so on the democratic side of the political spectrum, but I am denying these are random acts of violence that were not influenced or orchestrated by larger entities. To think that a very specific demographic of person, the exact demographic an entirely political party makes an active effort to oppose, wouldn’t be the prime candidate for an organization set on causing political divide via tragedy is laughable. Matthew Crooks, the Trump shooter, just happened to be a Trans supporter who had been publicly educated under the Blackrock Organization, and was able to climb a roof with a rifle and evade security until the shots were fired. The narrative of him being a crazed left-wing maniac was later published. The School shooter we had discussed earlier also had references to Blackrock and other left-leaning ideologies etched into his rifle. Now, Kirk’s assassin was found to have similar messages engraved into his bullet casings? This isn’t Vietnam; no normal citizen is carving messages into their guns. I understand these are not “Normal Citizens” by many means, but what civilian has this thought process? It seems to be a very convenient way of leaving behind enough evidence to “clearly” show each killer’s political party affiliation. It might be one excuse if you take into consideration that these attacks are often looked at as suicide missions, where the killer has no intention of living to serve any form of punishment. However, that doesn’t quite fit the MO of the Kirk assassin. Kirk’s assassin ended up turning himself in. He’s alive and waiting for trial. Now, if someone is going out of their way to inscribe messages into a weapon, you’d imagine it was intended to be seen, no? So, what sense does the official report make that the rifle was found wrapped in a towel in the woods? A wife loses a husband, two kids lose a father, the right loses an activist, and the left loses support? So who benefits from this situation? The Democratic Party gains an excuse to push for gun control, to call their opposition the problem for supporting the 2nd Amendment. The right gains voters, an opprotunity to showcase anyone who opposes them as cold-blooded murderers and the insane. Meanwhile, you and I, the common American citizen, get to watch each other die. We get to watch the media tell us our friends across the aisle are evil and want to kill us. We get to watch the government spend day after day arguing about red vs. blue, making thousands of dollars a day argue while we struggle for food, gas, and rent. Conveniently, while all this chaos was going on and America was in mourning and confusion, Israel got away from criticism by one of their loudest opponents. Conveniently, HOURS after Kirk’s death, the US Government vetoed the release of Jeffrey Epstein’s files…again. I ask you again, who is benefiting? Not You. Not I. This is the latest attempt to insight a political civil war by a group of elite who will willingly throw away countless citizens’ lives to make sure they control the narrative. As much justification there may be to be angry, confused, upset, or vengeful, please realize that is exactly what they want. I cannot confidently tell you who was behind this attack specifically, who knew about it, who let it happen, and why it wasn’t prevented. What I can tell you, however, is that this is not Red vs Blue. This is not Republican vs. Democrat. This is Them vs. Us. Do not fall into the oversimplified trap that this is the work of one party to attack another. Stand united and know that we, not as Republicans, not as democrats, but as Americans, are under attack while the people telling us to side with them keep getting richer off our misery. I encourage everyone to continue open discourse, to continue questioning the narrative, and to continue looking for who is benefiting from your misfortune. I also encourage sharing your thoughts and opinions on this matter! For my final thought, I’ll leave you with a quote from the late great Norm McDonald, “It says here in this history book that luckily, the good guys have won every single time. What are the odds?”.

Sources:

“‘Something Big Will Happen’: Alleged X Post before Charlie Kirk Shooting Surfaces.” Hindustan Times, 11 Sept. 2025, http://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/something-big-will-happen-alleged-x-post-before-charlie-kirk-utah-university-uvu-shooting-surfaces-101757541163939.html.

Ahmadi, Ali Abbas. “George Zinn: Man Falsely Claimed He Shot Kirk to Distract from Real Gunman, Police Say.” BBC News, BBC, 16 Sept. 2025, http://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c20e1jx0p5jo.

Andone, Dakin, et al. “At Least 2 Children Killed and 17 People Injured in Shooting at Minneapolis Catholic School Mass.” CNN, Cable News Network, 28 Aug. 2025, http://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/annunciation-catholic-school-minneapolis-shooting-08-27-25.

Turnbull, Tiffanie. “Charlie Kirk: What We Know about Fatal Shooting of Conservative US Activist.” BBC News, BBC, 12 Sept. 2025, http://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy04p4x21e5o.